There
is no concrete fossil evidence to support the “ape-man” image, which is
unceasingly indoctrinated by the media and evolutionist academic
circles. With brushes in their hands, evolutionists produce imaginary
creatures, yet the fact that these drawings have no matching fossils
constitutes a serious problem for them. One of the interesting methods
they employ to overcome this problem is to “produce” the fossils they
cannot find. 'The Piltdown Man' -- the biggest scandal in the history of
science, is a typical example of this method.
Piltdown Man: An orang-utan's jaw and a human skull!
A well-known doctor and amateur
paleoanthropologist, Charles Dawson, came out with an assertion that he
had found a jawbone and a cranial fragment in a pit in Piltdown, England in 1912 CE. ُُEven
though the jawbone was more ape-like, the teeth and the skull were like
a man’s. These specimens were labeled the “Piltdown Man.” Alleged to
be 500,000 years old, they were displayed as an absolute proof of human
evolution in several museums. For more than 40 years, many scientific
articles were written on the “Piltdown Man,” many interpretations and
drawings were made and the fossil was presented as an important evidence
of human evolution. No less than 500 doctoral theses were written on
the subject.
The famous American
paleo-anthropologist Henry Fairfield Osborn said: “…we have to be
reminded over and over again that Nature is full of paradoxes and this
is an astonishing finding about early man…” while he was visiting the
British Museum in 1935 CE.
In 1949 CE, Kenneth Oakley from the British Museum’s
paleontology department attempted to try the method of “fluorine
testing,” a new test used for determining the date of some old fossils. A
trial was made on the fossil of the Piltdown Man. The result was
astounding. During the test, it was realised that the jawbone of the
Piltdown Man did not contain any fluorine. This indicated that it had
remained buried no more than a few years. The skull, which contained
only a small amount of fluorine, showed that it was only a few thousand
years old.
The latest chronological studies
made with the fluorine method have revealed that the skull is only a few
thousand years old. It was determined that the teeth in the jawbone
belonging to an orang-utan had been worn down artificially and that the
“primitive” tools discovered with the fossils were simple imitations
that had been sharpened with steel implements. In the detailed analysis
completed by Weiner, this forgery was revealed to the public in 1953 CE.
The skull belonged to a 500-year-old man and the mandibular bone
belonged to a recently dead ape!
The teeth were thereafter specially
arranged in an array and added to the jaw and the joints were filed in
order to resemble that of a man. Then all these pieces were stained with
potassium dichromate to give them a dated appearance. These stains
began to disappear when dipped in acid. Le Gros Clark, who was in the
team that disclosed the forgery could not hide his astonishment at this
situation and said that “the evidences of artificial abrasion
immediately sprang to the eye. Indeed so obvious did they seem it may
well be asked – how was it that they had escaped notice before?” In the
wake of all this, “Piltdown Man” was hurriedly removed from the British Museum where it had been displayed for more than 40 years.
Nebraska Man: The phantom who was born from a pig’s tooth!
In 1922 CE, Henry Fairfield Osborn, manager of the American Museum of Natural History, declared that he had found a fossil molar tooth in West Nebraska
near Snake Brook belonging to the Pliocene period. This tooth allegedly
bore the common characteristics of both man and ape. Deep scientific
arguments began, in which some interpreted this tooth to be of
Pithecanthropus erectus while others claimed it was closer to human
beings. This fossil which aroused extensive debate was called the
“Nebraska Man.” It was also immediately given a “scientific name”:
Hesperopithecus haroldcooki.
Many authorities gave Osborn their
support. Based on this single tooth, reconstructions of the Nebraska
Man’s head and body were drawn. Moreover, the Nebraska Man was even
pictured along with his wife and children, as a whole family in a
natural setting.
All of these scenarios were
developed from just one tooth. Evolutionist circles accredited this
“ghost man” to such an extent that when a researcher named William Bryan
opposed these biased decisions relying on a single tooth, he was
harshly criticized.
In 1927 CE, other parts of the
skeleton were also found. According to these newly-discovered pieces,
the tooth belonged neither to a man nor to an ape. It was realized that
it belonged to an extinct species of wild American pig called
Prosthennops. William Gregory entitled his article published in Science
magazine where he announced this fault as: “Hesperopithecus: Apparently
not an ape nor a man.” Then all the drawings of Hesperopithecus
haroldcooki and “his family” were hurriedly removed from evolutionary
literature.
Ota Benga: The African in the cage
After Darwin
advanced the claim with his book The Descent of Man that man evolved
from ape-like living beings, he started to seek fossils to support this
contention. However, some evolutionists believed that “half-man
half-ape” creatures were to be found not only in the fossil record, but
also alive in various parts of the world. In the early 20th
century CE, these pursuits for “living transitional links” led to
unfortunate incidents, one of the cruelest of which is the story of a
Pygmy by the name of Ota Benga.
Ota Benga was captured in 1904 CE by an evolutionist researcher in the Congo.
In his own tongue, his name meant “friend”. He had a wife and two
children. Chained and caged like an animal, he was taken to the USA
where evolutionist scientists displayed him to the public in the St
Louis World Fair along with other ape species and introduced him as “the
closest transitional link to man.” Two years later, they took him to
the Bronx Zoo in New York
and there they exhibited him under the denomination of “ancient
ancestors of man” along with a few chimpanzees, a gorilla named Dinah
and an orang-utan called Dohung. Dr. William T. Hornaday, the zoo’s
evolutionist director gave long speeches on how proud he was to have
this exceptional “transitional form” in his zoo and treated caged Ota
Benga as if he were an ordinary animal. Unable to bear the treatment he
was subjected to, Ota Benga eventually committed suicide.
The ‘Piltdown Man’, the ‘Nebraska
Man’, Ota Benga…. These scandals demonstrate that evolutionist
scientists do no hesitate to employ any kind of unscientific method to
prove their theory. Bearing this point in mind, when we look at the
other so-called evidence of the “human evolution” myth, we confront a
similar situation. Here, there is a fictional story and an army of
volunteers ready to try everything to verify this story.